Models Considered by the Academic Task Force

Introduction

At its meeting on Friday, October 4, 2013, Faculty Senate approved the following motion, which was subsequently approved by the Provost:

“The Faculty Senate recommends that the quintile system be reconsidered.”

The Academic Task Force is pleased to report that it has been reconsidering the quintile system since May, 2013, and after six months of consideration of various grouping and connection models, has adopted its own Five Groups with Professional Judgment (FGPJ) Model. While this model has similarities to the original quintile system, it has been adopted only after consideration of no fewer than seven different models, and for reasons that are not connected to the original adoption of the quintile system. The reasons for adopting this system are:

  • it has a reasonable degree of simplicity;
  • it is easy to implement and understand;
  • it includes a connection model that takes advantage of existing professional expertise within the university;
  • it has some degree of flexibility in terms of program placement in categories while avoiding the potential risk of having empty groups; and
  • it can be subjected to cross-checking and self-assessment during the operation of the process.

A further advantage of this model is that it can be used to help the development of future models for later iterations of the prioritization process.

The Academic Task Force therefore considers that it has met both the spirit and the letter of the Faculty Senate motion, and wishes to report a successful completion of the reconsideration of the quintile system.

 

Models Considered

In order to take a large number of diverse and multi-faceted academic programs and reduce them to a number of groups of similar programs, two models are required. One model is concerned with how the programs will be grouped, relating to number and sizes of the final groups, together with any constraints about the numbers in each group. We could term this the grouping model. Second, one needs a model that connects the facets of the program to membership in the various groups, by explaining how some information about each program, such as that collected using the template, is used to determine program placement. This we can call the connection model.

The so-called Dickeson Model is vague on both counts. It suggests five groups with equal numbers in each group, but gives examples of programs that used three groups, as well as other numbers of groups. There isn’t a strong case made for the number of groups, so its grouping model is weakly specified. The Dickeson Model does little to specify what the connection model should be, leaving it largely up to the individual institution’s judgment.

To develop a pair of suitable models has been one of the AcTF primary activities over the last six months. The following models were considered.

Dickeson Model           This was too vague for our use, and is also predicated on being a triage model. We are more concerned with information flows, and so we effectively abandoned this model very early in the process, around late May. Added to the difficulty of determining exactly what the Dickeson Model consists of, is its very open and flexible nature. Essentially, the Dickeson Model can be reduced to “cluster programs into meaningful groups, based on some meaningful connection model.” Whether this is a distinct model, or just a statement of the patently obvious is open to debate. Given Dickeson‘s objective with the book is to urge universities and colleges to go through the process, rather than sell them a ‘one-size-fits-all’ process, the specifications of the two critical models is necessarily general and vague.

Simple Ranking           This only works when the various facets of all the programs can be mapped onto a meaningful numerical scale, which can then be divided at suitable points to form groups. The only definite grouping model here is to use groups of one program. The problem we faced was that there was no single meaningful scale that could represent the full range of program diversity we were trying to capture, so after considerable discussion over six months, we finally abandoned this model. Add to that the difficulties of developing a meaningful connection model for almost 400 very diverse programs, and this approach is very complex and possibly unworkable if truly meaningful results are required.

To give a basic example of the ranking model and to understand its limitations in our circumstances, recall that IQ is a simple linear scale representing some aspect of human intelligence. However, it has no provision for dealing with social skills, creativity, insight, determination, perseverance or leadership, all of which are important for success in many domains of endeavor. Also, IQ scores have a standard deviation of around 3 (in certain tests), so in order to determine whether a difference of, say, 5 in IQ is actually meaningful, we have to resort to statistical testing methods, something that a large group of the general population finds hard to grasp. So IQ scores give a false sense of precision by the very fact of giving numerical values on what appears to be a real number line, while in fact they are fairly fuzzy values that cannot be readily compared by simple differences.

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)             This method, with a large body of supporting literature and examples, including software (ExpertChoice) and consulting services over many years (decades), was considered quite seriously (especially since CTC had already used it for a similar activity within the college), but was abandoned because it is far better at making fine discriminations than it is for grouping like with like, which was the AcTF’s primary objective. It is also highly mathematical and so difficult to explain to a significant body of the faculty, as well as needing considerable preliminary work that really requires a significant body of information already on hand.

AHP requires that every pair-wise combination of components for each criterion are compared, assessed for consistency, and then combined to give a set of combination weights, based on the principal eigenvector of the pair-wise comparison matrix. All of the criteria then undergo a series of pair-wise comparisons, and the resulting matrix of comparisons is transformed into a set of weights. While this gives a mathematically sound way to make fine distinctions between individual items, it downplays professional judgment by seeking to reduce it to the finest levels. It is far more useful when it is applying non-professional experience to the determination of the weights, as it can then bring together a lot of disparate experience and knowledge. At UAA we have the advantage of being able to apply professional judgment directly to the problem.

Analytical Network Process (ANP)   This is a development of the AHP model, but includes feedback loops in the hierarchies. It was abandoned with relatively little consideration after AHP was abandoned, primarily because of its complexity and uncertain utility for UAA.

Quadrants       This model was discussed in depth for almost two months, but was abandoned because of the difficulty of translating the multiple facets of programs into two numerical scales, and because the scales to be used were vague and difficult to measure in terms of outcomes. It was developed as a home-grown compromise among the various connection models being discussed at the time, and as a means of trying to clarify the discussion.

Clustering        This model allows the data to form its own clusters, being a form of (initially) unsupervised classification. This model has several advantages, as it can be applied to data whose form is unknown (the situation at UAA), and it can be iteratively applied to refine the clusters. By using the initial clusters as a means of refining the understanding of the data, a more supervised classification can be undertaken to produce more meaningful groupings, based on the actual data, rather than pre-conceptions. It can also do a form of data mining, helping to find things in the data that we were not expecting. However it, too, is highly mathematical and statistical, and so difficult to explain fully to the wider audience of the university community, and so was abandoned primarily for that reason.

Five Groups with Professional Judgment (FGPJ)     The general objective of prioritization is to collect programs into groups that contain programs that are reasonably alike, i.e., share many characteristics. One can have very many groups, or very few, depending upon the degree of discrimination required. After considerable discussion over six months, the AcTF decided to adopt five groups, as that was a convenient number over which to distribute 330+ programs. To have more groups would have tended to provide finer discrimination in the middle, which makes no significant difference to resource allocation decisions, which happen near the ends of the distribution. To have had fewer groups would lump too many programs together at the edges, where we wished to have greater discrimination. So five groups is a compromise between the most basic number of groups (three: more resources, stay the same, fewer resources), and a multiplicity of groups, mostly dividing up the ‘stay the same’ group. As we had the flexibility to decide, we chose a minimum distribution of 15% of programs into each group. This allows 25% of programs to fall as they may. This constitutes our adopted grouping model.

Future iterations of the process may have rather different goals, such as finer discrimination of programs, especially in the ‘stay the same’ groups. In that case, more groups can be used, with different distributions. That decision will be made to suit the circumstances and needs of that time. For this, the first iteration, the selected grouping model seems the best all-round choice.

The connection model to be used is to be based on faculty assessment by the AcTF as a whole of every program against 10 criteria, which will lead to a professional judgment about which category the program is most suited to. While the criteria are weighted, these weights are a guide to the importance that is to be given to each criterion in the overall professional judgment process, not to a weighting of numerical scores for each criterion.

While it could be argued that numerical scores could be given for each criterion, and then combined according to the weights, and that this would remove the need for professional judgment in the process, all it does is shift the professional judgment to the criteria scoring level, then giving this professional judgment a false patina of deterministic mathematical calculation. Creating a rubric for scoring the criteria, so as to limit the input of professional judgment, is another false effort to limit professional judgment, as professional judgment is used to determine the rubric in the first place. The AcTF feels that the professional judgment of professional and experienced faculty is best applied at the highest and most general level of program assessment, so as to allow the AcTF to look at each program holistically, rather than being forced to consider each facet in complete isolation. This places reliance upon professional judgment at a very high level, but that is why the AcTF was selected from experienced and dedicated faculty. To try to remove professional judgment from the process and make it a simple counting process would mean that it could be done just as easily by a group of junior administrative staff, and there would be no consideration for the synergistic interactions among the various facets of each program.

An important point to recognize is that while there are five groups to be used, the AcTF is trying hard to avoid a linear interpretation of these groups. We suspect that we will see groups that differ on several different diverse criteria, while being homogenous within the group, and that this multi-dimensional separation will not readily allow a linear interpretation. While it is easy to place five groups into a strictly linear arrangement, such as we do with the A to F grading scheme for coursework, it is not the only possible arrangement. Five groups can be arranged in a circle or a pentagram, each of which has different meanings and overtones, even while the groups remain in exactly the same relative positions. While there will be one group that can be interpreted as a ‘winner’ (the one getting access to additional resources through PBAC), and another that can be interpreted as a ‘loser’ (the one to be subject to further consideration), this is not entirely the case, and the arrangement of the other groups may not be anything like linear.

(It should also be noted that getting into the ‘winner’ group does not guarantee success, as it may lead to fighting within the program over the additional resources, leading to an inability to operate effectively and so a decline in the program. Meanwhile, a program in the ‘loser’ group may find itself able to restructure and reinvent itself in ways that it was unable to do in normal circumstances, and so become a long-term winner. Nothing is guaranteed from the outcomes of the prioritization process, especially winning or losing in the long term, and PBAC is not the only source of funding open to programs. The AcTF will provide information about UAA’s academic programs to the Provost, to each program, and to the UAA community. That is as far as our mandate goes. Beyond that point, it is a completely different game with different players and very different rules.)

Discussion

While this choice of the grouping and connection models may make it seem like we have not come very far in six months, the AcTF has covered nearly all of the grouping and connection models that are reasonably available, straightforward to implement, and widely comprehensible. Remember also that the Dickeson Model isn’t really a pair of models, just general guidance. We have tried for something reasonably definite that could be explained to a wide audience. We avoided establishing a connection model that may force the data into patterns that were preconceived, rather than based on how the data actually fall. We have focused on a connection model that takes maximum advantage of the experienced and professional group of faculty on the AcTF, rather than passing everything off to a mathematical approach based on simplified scoring and aggregation of scores by simple weights.

Professional judgment may not seem like an ‘objective’ system, such as something purely mathematical may seem, but such a mathematical system simply hides the judgment behind a fog of numbers. Professional judgment, being based on personal experience and knowledge, is necessarily subjective, but ‘subjective’ does not mean biased or unfair. Professional judgment offers the best way to ensure that the full diversity of programs at the university are acknowledged and judged from the viewpoint of people who work in academic programs at UAA, rather than outsiders. These people are our colleagues, people who have been through many of the problems, issues and tribulations that we all face. They represent and advocate for no program, but bring their professional expertise to the task of looking at all of UAA’s programs. They are every program’s best assurance of a fair, knowledgeable and understanding assessment, and the combination of eighteen diverse people working as a team strengthens this.

The AcTF intends to run a number of the abandoned models in the background, as the primary grouping process unfolds. This will be done as a comparison check on the Five Groups with Professional Judgment (FGPJ) model we have adopted: do we get roughly similar results, regardless of the model we use, particularly in the more critical groups? The AcTF feels that it is important that we assess our own process, especially since there is significant concern about that process in the UAA community. The AcTF does reserve the right to adopt a different grouping model for the final report, e.g., fewer or more groups and a different distribution, should the data show that a different approach is clearly better, but we won’t know that without parallel analysis of the process and the data.

Parallel analysis would be done as a means of analyzing how the data actually fall, both as a guide to the current process, and as a guide to future iterations. We intend to look at the effectiveness of the different criteria being used at influencing the final placement: are some criteria less helpful than others, or did we miss some important criteria? Are there criteria that cannot be differentiated in outcome from others, i.e., they have a very high degree of correlation? Are there apparent groupings of program that, while not affecting the current outcomes of prioritization, tell us something about the nature of programs at UAA that was not understood before? Would such groupings cause us to rethink aspects of the prioritization process itself?

Conclusions

The AcTF has explored the strengths and weaknesses of the original model that was suggested to us (the so-called Dickeson Model), and using it as a starting point, has explored a range of options for both the creation of groups of programs, as well as the means of getting programs into these groups. The emphasis has been on flexibility and meaningfulness, as well as comprehensibility across the wide university community. We have defined the grouping and connection models that we intend to use for this process, while reserving the right to alter these if the data suggest that a better solution.

We have tried to use the strengths we possess, which include a diverse group of experienced faculty from across the university, and the professional expertise of those faculty. We have discussed the various options at considerable length, and while many different models were advanced, we have collectively developed and adopted our own FGPJ Model as being workable, comprehensible and meaningful for the process.

Posted in Models Tagged with: , , , , ,
54 comments on “Models Considered by the Academic Task Force
  1. How are things going to change with Chafee in position for the president next term? Maybe he might have some chances to get

  2. it just leads me to do better things for this life. Very meaningful, thank you very much, wish you happy.Viral Loop Review best viral theme tool

  3. More and more people are using this Data Dictionary every day which is great

  4. Very informative post . Great thanks .

  5. Very important post it is very excellent sharing.

  6. However although education is considered compulsory for every child, other parents will prefer homeschooling for their children either in formal or informal settings.

  7. Thank you for sharing. It so great Dude

  8. Very useful post. This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. Really its great article. Keep it up!

  9. friv 4 says:

    Thanks for the great post. Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.

  10. “Nữ hoàng giải trí” Hồ Ngọc Hà cũng lộ ảnh thẻ khi cô dự thi Người mẫu thời trang Hà Nội mở rộng năm 1999. Trông Hà Hồ ở hiện tại không chỉ đẹp hơn mà còn trẻ hơn.

  11. Tối 27/3, Gala trao giải “The Remix 2016” diễn ra tại nhà thi đấu Quân khu 7, TP.HCM. Top 4 của mùa giải thứ 2 gồm: Noo Phước Thịnh, Hương Tràm, Maya và Soobin Hoàng Sơn. Trải qua 10 liveshow tranh tài, team Noo Phước Thịnh là nhóm thí sinh giữ phong độ khá tốt khi liên tục trong nhiều tuần chiếm giữ vị trí “ngôi vương”. Đội thi này cũng có 3 tuần giành được số điểm 40 tuyệt đối từ ban giám khảo.

  12. I am also on the AcTF. I support everything Bill has said as accurate; however, I would highlight other aspects of our discussions. Perhaps Bill’s and my approaches to Reconsidering the Quintiles reflect our professional and disciplinary backgrounds. (Note to those worried about AcTF not having sufficient representation:

  13. am also on the AcTF. I support everything Bill has said as accurate; however, I would highlight other aspects of our discussions. Perhaps Bill’s and my approaches to Reconsidering the Quintiles reflect our professional and disciplinary backgrounds. (Note to those worried about AcTF not having sufficient representation: While we are not “representing” any programs, insofar as we are not advocating for or against any, we do bring different ways of thinking that I believe include the many approaches of UAA faculty.)
    I originally favored the quintiles

  14. Harry Kane, trong lần đầu được sắm vai kép chính trên hàng công thay Rooney, đã lập công. Jamie Vardy không còn trẻ, nhưng cũng gieo hy vọng hướng tới mùa hè nước Pháp khi vào sân thay Welbeck và gần như ngay lập tức ghi bàn đầu tiên trong màu áo ĐTQG. Tương tự là Eric Dier, chủ nhân của bàn ấn định tỷ số 3-2 là người mới có lần thứ ba khoác áo “Tam Sư” và chưa từng lập công trước đó.

    Không ghi bàn, nhưng một cái tên khác cũng để lại ấn tượng mạnh tại Berlin là Dele Alli. Cầu thủ 19 tuổi của Tottenham nổi lên ở Ngoại hạng Anh mùa này và đã mang theo phong độ ấn tượng đó vào trận đấu hôm qua. Anh phối hợp rất ăn ý với Kane, nhiều phen làm hàng thủ Đức điên đảo. Nếu không vì Neuer có hai pha cứu thua đẳng cấp về cuối trận, Alli có thể đã ghi được ít nhất một bàn trong trận đấu mà anh được bầu làm Cầu thủ hay nhất trận.

    Delle Ali tạo nên cảm hứng lớn lao cho hàng công tuyển Anh bằng lối chơi tốc độ và những tình huống phối hợp ăn ý với Harry Kane. Ảnh: Reuters.
    Nếu bốn cái tên trên, cùng một Ross Barkley chơi rất hay trong vai trò nhạc trưởng, mang lại sức sống mãnh liệt cho tuyến đầu, thì hàng thủ của “Tam Sư” lại ít nhiều gây lo lắng cho Hodgson và người hâm mộ tuyển Anh. Đức hôm qua có rất nhiều thử nghiệm nhân sự và chơi không thật sự tương xứng với đẳng cấp của một nhà ĐKVĐ thế giới, nhưng họ vẫn nhiều lần dễ dàng bẻ gãy hàng thủ “Tam Sư”.

    Cặp trung vệ Tim Cahill – Smalling không tạo cảm giác yên tâm, đặc biệt là ở vị trí của Cahill, người vẫn chơi rất tốt ở cấp CLB. Hodgson có lẽ đang rất sốt ruột chờ đợi một John Stones hoàn toàn lành lặn trở lại để đá cặp với Smalling.

  15. Harry Kane, trong lần đầu tiên đá chính ở tuyển Anh, đã chứng tỏ anh xứng đáng được trao trọng trách với bàn rút ngắn cách biệt bằng một cú sút chìm chính xác. Jamie Vardy, ngôi sao mới nổi cùng hiện tượng Leicester City mùa này, gỡ hoà 2-2 ở phút 74, sau đường tạt của Nathan Clyne. Không dừng lại ở đó, đến phút bù giờ thứ nhất, Eric Dier đánh đầu chính xác, ấn định thắng lợi 3-2 cho các vị khách.

  16. Với đội ngũ nhân viên phục vụ tận tình, chu đáo, sản phẩm đảm bảo chất lượng, đúng mẫu mã với một giá thành chuẩn xác nhất DNTN Thương Mại Hoàng trần là người bạn đáng tin cậy của mỗi người và mỗi nhà.

  17. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie giúp duy trì sự khỏe khoắn góp phần làm đẹp cho da và chăm sóc sức khỏe mỗi ngày. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie Tân Bình của Man Water chuyên cung cấp các sản phẩm nước suối tinh khiết Lavie chính hãng, đa dạng về thể tích với một giá thành chuẩn xác nhất.

  18. Nước uống suối tinh Lavie là sản phẩm nước uống đóng chai tại nguồn với công nghệ của Nestlé Water một trong những tập đoàn nước đóng chai hàng đầu thế giới với quá trình xử lý khép kín .

  19. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie Tân Bình được cung cấp bởi Man Water là đại lý phân phối chính thức của Lavie với dịch vụ chất lượng, uy tín, giao hàng tận nơi, trong thời gian sớm nhất, phục vụ mọi thời điểm trong ngày khi khách hàng có nhu cầu về nước uống. Quận Tân Bình điểm đặt chân đầu tiên của khác du lịch quốc tế khi bước xuống sân bay quốc tế Tân Sơn Nhất. Quận Tân Bình có diên tích lớn với lượng dân cư đông đúc. Cuộc sống ngày càng hiện đại nhu cầu sức khỏe con người ngày càng cao trong đó việc cung cấp đủ lương nước cho cơ thể là một nhu cầu cần thiết. Nước uống suối tinh Lavie là sản phẩm nước uống đóng chai tại nguồn với công nghệ của Nestlé Water một trong những tập đoàn nước đóng chai hàng đầu thế giới với quá trình xử lý khép kín .Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie giúp duy trì sự khỏe khoắn góp phần làm đẹp cho da và chăm sóc sức khỏe mỗi ngày. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie Tân Bình của Man Water chuyên cung cấp các sản phẩm nước suối tinh khiết Lavie chính hãng, đa dạng về thể tích với một giá thành chuẩn xác nhất. Quý khách có nhu cầu đặt nước suối tinh khiết Lavie tại Tân Bình vui lòng liên hệ:

  20. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie Quận 6 là dịch vụ giao nước suối lavie nhanh và chất lượng nhất mà Man Water thực hiện tại địa bàn quận 6, một trong những quận có quá trình phát triển nhanh nhất ở thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Quận 6 nổi tiếng với chợ Bình Tây , một trong những chợ đầu mối buôn bán sỉ nổi tiếng cả nước. Nước suối tinh khiết Lavie là nhãn hiệu nước uống đã được nhiều người tin tưởng lâu năm, được sản xuất với một quy trình khép kín tại nguồn . Khách hàng có nhu cầu đặt nước uống Man Water tại quận 6 có thể hoàn toàn yên tâm. Man Water cam kết nước suối tinh khiết Lavie khi đến tay khách quý khách có chất lượng đảm bảo và có được giá cả tốt nhất so với những nơi khác trên thị trường

  21. Dịch vụ giao nước Aquafina tại khu vực Quận 1, Quận 10, Quận 11, Quận 12 của DNTN Hoàng Trần là một dịch vụ uy tín, chất lượng. Sản phẩm nước Aquafina luôn đảm bảo chính hãng, đúng mẫu mã và với một giá thành chuẩn xác nhất.

  22. had not necessarily intended to share this widely, but since people seem very eager for a constructive starting point, I have shared it within the College http://teachersday2015.com/2016/love-romantic-happy-valentines-day-2016-quotes-poems-for-him.html of Engineering. I feel like I should share it with all my colleagues to do with as you like. I don’t want to give the impression that this tool is “officially sanctioned” by the AcTF, and it’s certainly in a rough form, since I’ve had no feedback from anyone on how helpful it actually is. cvvdfbfgnghmgmgj,

  23. Tổ huyết yến là một trong những loại yến quý hiếm và giàu dinh dưỡng nhất với nhiều công dụng tuyệt vời cho sức khỏe. giá hộp yến sào khánh hòa Vì thế mà nó đã trở thành món quà biếu Tết vô cùng ý nghĩa và sang trọng để bạn biếu tặng người thân yêu, bạn bè, đồng nghiệp cũng như sếp của mình. bảng giá yến sào khánh hòa Đây là món quà sức khỏe được nhiều người lựa chọn làm quà tết năm 2015. giá tổ yến thô Chúng tôi đang có chương trình khuyến mãi tri ân khách hàng khi mua tổ huyết yến tặng nước hồng sâm. Vì thế bạn còn chần chừ gì nữa mà không nhanh chóng chọn mua sản phẩm này làm quà tết cho người thân yêu.

  24. Chương trình khuyến mãi mua tổ huyết yến tặng nước hồng sâm cao cấp. Để thể hiện lòng biết ơn và tri ân khách hàng trong dịp tết Ất Mùi khi mua tổ huyết yến quý khách hàng được tặng ngay bộ sản phẩm nước hồng sâm trị giá lên đến 450.000 nghìn đồng. giá tổ yến nguyên chất Tổ yến được chia làm 3 loại: Tổ yến trắng, tổ yến hồng và tổ yến huyết.

  25. Thuật ngữ “spa” đã được sử dụng cho một nơi mà nước được tiêu thụ và tắm trong; “tắm” nơi nước được sử dụng chủ yếu cho tắm, trị liệu, hoặc giải trí; và “tốt” nơi nước được tiêu thụ.Ngày nay nó là phổ biến hơn cho nước khoáng để được đóng chai tại các nguồn cho phân phối tiêu thụ. Đi du lịch đến các trang web nước khoáng để trực tiếp truy cập vào nước là hiếm, và trong nhiều trường hợp có thể không (vì quyền sở hữu độc quyền thương mại quyền). Có rất nhiều hơn 3.000 thương hiệu nước khoáng thương mại có sẵn trên toàn thế giới.

  26. How long has it been since any of the programs have been assessed relative to the rest of the other programs to see which ones are maintaining their relevance to the mission of the university and others not so much? Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I do not recall any previous prioritization efforts since I came here in 1994. Unless education is unlike any other endeavor in human activity, the environment changes, technology changes, demand for skill sets change, and as a result some programs may be losing their relevance and yes, the priorities change. This exercise will provide the information necessary to identify those programs that need redirection, additional resources, revision, and some may benefit from being discontinued. The idea that once a program is started it will last forever is not realistic because we live in a dynamic environment and things change.

  27. Very rare and exclusive kind of posts we do not see these kind of informative stuff nowadays, But thanks a lot for posting this.

  28. Vì nếu có trứng hoặc chim non mà ta lấy tổ sẽ khiếm yến kiệt sức khi tiếp tục làm tổ mới luôn khi chưa có thời gian nghỉ ngơi. Việc lấy tổ yến diễn ra một cách nhanh chóng, nhẹ nhàng nhất có thể. b) Chế biến yến sào khánh hòa Quy trình khai thác yến sào gian nan nguy hiểm là vậy, thì công đoạn chế biến yến sào cũng không hề đơn giản. Thông thường, tổ yến thô và tổ yến đã qua tinh chế có giá chênh lệch khá lớn. Đó cũng là lý do mà việc chế biến yến sào cũng cần sự tỉ mỉ, công phu giống như khi khai thác yến sào. Tuy nhiên hiện nay trên thị trường có khá nhiều cửa hàng bán sản phẩm yến sào nguyên chấtđó cũng là do tâm lý khách hàng tin rằng tổ yến thô sẽ nguyên chất hơn nên mua về và tự sơ chế tại nhà. Nói là tỉ mỉ quả không sai, tổ yến thô khi mới khai thác về có chứa rất nhiều lông còn sót lại của chim yến quyện chặt cùng với tổ yến. Và để chế biến yến sào thô cần làm những bước sau: – Đầu tiên ngâm yến sào vào trong nước sạch, tuỳ độ dày hay mỏng của tổ yến mà có thể ngâm từ 1 đến 2 giờ, đảm bảo sau đó các sợi của yến sào tơi ra là được – Sau khi ngâm và làm tổ yến tơi thì vớt ra đĩa để ráo nước và tiến hành nhặt lông chim lẫn vào trong yến sào bằng nhíp hoặc vật chuyên dùng. Nghe công việc dùng nhíp nhặt lông chim trên tổ yến thì có vẻđơn giản nhung trên thực tế công việc này đồi hỏi sự tỉ mỉ cao và không phải nhặt một lần là có thể xong được.

  29. Cũng chính vì vậy mà không phải ai cũng làm được nghề này bởi nó chứa đựng sự nặng nhọc và cực kỳ nguy hiểm. Tất cả “đồ nghề” của người thợ lấy tổ yến chỉ vỏn vẹn với thang tre, dây thừng, sao chĩa phải trèo lên những váchđá cheo leo, lách mình qua những khe đá hiểm trở hoặcđong đưa theo dây tụt xuống vực sâu hun hút để bóc từng tổ yến. Vàđương nhiên với những công việc mà chỉ một cái đặt chân sai lệch sẽ mất cả tính mạng thì người thợ lấy tổ yến luôn phải đối mặt nó giống như một thói quen. Chim yến làm tổ và đẻ trứng vào khoảng tầm tháng 4 và tháng 8 chính vì thế mà mùa yến sào hàng năm cũng rơi vào khoảngđó, một năm yến sào được thu hoạch hai lần, đó lại là lúc những thợ khai thác yến hứa hẹn kiếm một mùa bội thu * Tổ yến nhà Khác hoàn toàn với yếnđảođó là yến nhà được nuôi tại nhà nên chúng ta có thể hoàn toàn chủ động theo dõi đểthu hoạch tổ yến. Nhà cho chim yến thường được thiết kế rộng khoảng hai gian và 4 tầng, và vì đặc tính của chim yến là thích làm tổ trên cao nên làm nhà cho chim yến càng cao càng tốt. Lưu ý là nơi đặt nhà của chim yến nên thuận tiện cho việc chim đi kiếmăn ngoài thiên nhiên vì đặcđiểm của chim yến chúng ta không thể cho ăn như những vật nuôi khác được Quay trở lại về thu hoạch tổ yến nhà, người nuôi cần phải chọn thờiđiểm thu hoạch thích hợp khi chim đi kiếmăn không cóở tổ. Người thu hoach di chuyển vào tầng yến làm tổ nhẹ nhàng tánh gây tiếng động làm những chim yến cònởđó sợ hãi, vì nếu gây động mạnh, chúng có thể bỏ tổ bay mất khi cảm thấy không còn an toàn. Khi lấy tổ yến, người hái cần kiểm tra chắc chắn trong tổ không có trứng hoặc là chim non.

  30. Hiện nay yến sào thiên nhiên Khánh Hoà đang là một thương hiệu lớn mạnh nhất Châu Á, thương hiệu yến sào thiên nhiên Khánh Hoà đã trở thành thương hiệu sản phẩm thiên nhiên duy nhất được toàn thế giới công nhận tại Việt Nam. Nói đến yến sào không phải ai cũng hiểu nguồn gốc xuất xứ và quy trình khai thác ra sao. Vậy bài viết dưới đây sẽ phần nào giúp bạn đọc hiểu rõ hơn về quy trình khai thác và chế biến yến sào Khánh Hòa cao cấp. 1. Yến sào là gì? Yến sào là một trong những sản phẩm dinh dưỡng được nhiều người lựa chọn để chăm sóc sức khoẻ cho bản thân và những người thân yêu trong gia đình. Không những vậy từ xa xưa yến sào đã được coi như một món cao lương mỹ vị chỉ sử dụng trong cung đình làm món ăn cho vua chúa và giới quý tộc. Tại sao yến sào lại quý đến vậy ? Yến sào chính là tổ của chim yến và được làm từ chính nước bọt của chúng. Ban ngày yến đi săn lùng thực phẩm trên biển, đêm đến lại nhỏ dãi làm thành tổ.

  31. Có tác dụng dưỡng âm, bổ phế, tiêu đàm, trừ ho định suyễn. Dùng trong các chứng ho hen, khái huyết, suy nhược cơ thể. Yến sào thường được dùng cho người hen suyễn, ho ra máu, suy nhược. Tổ yến được phối hợp với nhân sâm, đại táo, liên nhục, hoài sơn, đương quy, câu kỷ tử… để làm thuốc bổ cho người già yếu, người bệnh lâu ngày. Yến sào có tác dụng làm cường tráng, tăng sức dẻo dai, kích thích tiêu hóa, giúp an thần, gây ngủ, cầm máu, chữa được bệnh ho, thổ huyết, kiết lỵ. Đây là vị thuốc bổ rất tốt cho người ốm yếu, người cao tuổi, sản phụ băng huyết, trẻ em suy dinh dưỡng. Yến sào còn có hiệu quả trong điều trị hiếm muộn, suy thận, suy giảm trí nhớ. Sử dụng dài ngày làm đẹp da, tăng sức đề kháng của cơ thể. Liều dùng trung bình từ 6 – 12g mỗi ngày. Tham khảo thêm “lợi ích yến sào“. Thành phần yến sào: Theo nghiên cứu của các nhà khoa học trên thế giới cho thấy yến sào chứa các thanh tố dinh dưỡng quan trọng đó là acid amin rất cần thiết cho cơ thể: -Glycine: 1,99%, có tác dụng tốt cho da -Valine: 4,12% giúp mau lành tế bào cơ và tái tạo tế bào mới -Leucine: 4,56%, giúp điều chỉnh hàm lượng đường trong máu. -Isoleucine: 2,04 % giúp phục hồi nhanh sức khỏe -Threonine: 2,69%, tăng cường hệ miễn dịch và giúp hấp thụ các dưỡng chất cho cơ thể -Methionine: 0,46% hỗ trợ chống viêm khớp -Proline: 5,27% tăng cường phục hồi các cơ, mô, và da -Acid aspartic: 4,69%, giúp tăng trưởng tế bào.

    -Phenylalanine: 4,5%, giúp bổ não, tăng trí nhớ -Histidine: 2,09%, giúp cơ thể phát triển và tăng liên kết mô cơ bắp -Lysine: 1,75% tăng khả năng hấp thụ Ca, giúp xương chắc khỏe, chống lão hóa cột sống. -tryptophan: 0,7% có tác dụng ngăn ngừa ung thư -L-arginine:11,4% giúp cải thiện vấn đề sinh lý. Thành phần yến sào còn chứa 31 nguyên tố vi lượng như: sắt(Fe), nhôm (Al), silic, kẽm (Zn), magie (Mg).. có hàm lượng cao. Những nguyên tố này có vai trò quan trọng trong việc tạo máu, hoạt động thần kinh (Mg), tác động hoạt hóa cho nhiều enzyme trao đổi chất dinh dưỡng, tăng cường sự phát triển tuyến sinh dục (Zn). Một số cách nấu món ăn bổ dưỡng từ như sau: Yến thả: Sợi yến hấp cách thủy cho chín (không nấu trực tiếp với nước vì dễ bị nát và mất chất bổ) được xếp vào bát con, rải thịt gà xé lên trên, rồi chan nước luộc gà thật nóng. Thêm gia vị cho đủ ngọt, ăn làm một lần. Hình. Món yến sào gà xé Yến tần: Sợi yến nhồi vào bụng chim bồ câu đã làm thịt sạch cùng với ít gạo nếp, đậu xanh, mộc nhĩ hoặc nấm hương, gia vị. Hầm cách thủy cho chín nhừ. Ăn trong ngày. Yến sào bồ câu non Chè yến: Sợi yến đã hấp cách thủy cho vào bát con. Đường kính nấu với nước đến sôi, bắc ra, cho lòng trắng trứng và vỏ trứng tán vụn để quyện lấy tạp chất. Lọc thật trong, rồi dội vào bát yến. Có thể nấu chung với hạt sen, táo đỏ, hoặc hạnh nhân. Ăn khi chè còn ấm hoặc để lạnh cũng rất ngon. Quý khách đọc thêm chuyên mục “món ăn yến sào” để biết thêm nhiều món ăn khác. Tóm lại, chim yến dùng nước miếng để làm thành yến sào, rất giàu chất đạm và khoáng chất, glucosamin thiên nhiên rất bổ dưỡng và là nguồn dược liệu qu‎ý của việt Nam. Chè yến chưng đường phèn là món ăn phổ biến của người sành ăn yến sào. Các bạn có thể làm theo cách sau để có được món yến chưng đường phèn ngon nhất và dinh dưỡng cao nhất. 1. Nguyên liệu: – 5g (1/2 tổ) tổ yến sào đã tinh chế. – 50g đường phèn – 4 ly nước lọc – 1 củ gừng 2. Cách làm yến chưng đường phèn -Sơ chế Yến sào. -Gọt vỏ gừng, rửa sạch để ráo, thái sợi nhỏ. -Giã nhuyễn đường phèn, cho vào nước lọc nấu sôi đến khi tan đều. Sau đó, cho nước đường, gừng, và yến sào ra thố, bắc lên bếp chưng cách thủy khoảng 30-40 phút. Chè Yến chưng đường phèn Hình. Chè Yến chưng đường phèn 3. Thưởng thức món chè yến đường phèn – Lấy chè yến đường phèn ra bát. Món này dùng nóng hay lạnh đều rất ngon. Theo những đầu bếp có kinh nghiệm nấu các món yến thì mỗi tuần chúng ta ăn ba bát chè yến đường phèn là vừa, tốt nhất là ăn trước khi đi ngủ để cơ thể có thể hấp thu trọn vẹn chất dinh dưỡng từ tổ yến sào. Đặc biệt đối với sản phụ, người già, người bị suy nhược cơ thể hoặc mới ốm dậy, ăn một bát chè tổ yến sẽ giúp cơ thể sảng khoái, thèm ăn, chống mệt mỏi. Cũng với cách làm tương tự, có thể nấu món chè yến hạt sen . Chúc quý khách ngon miệng.

  32. Yến sào (còn được gọi là tổ yến, hải yến, yến thái, quan yến) là tổ của loài chim yến biển. Yến sào tự nhiên có ở một số địa phương Nam Trung bộ như Khánh Hòa, Phú Yên, Quảng Nam, Đà Nẵng. Theo đông y, tổ yến có vị ngọt, tính bình, tác dụng vào các kinh phế và vị.

  33. Very rare and exclusive kind of posts we do not see these kind of informative stuff nowadays, But thanks a lot for posting this.
    hihi

  34. Cách làm món súp yến vi cá bổ dưỡng

    Súp yến vi cá làm món ăn vừa bổ sưỡng lại có hương vị độc đáo, hấp dẫn đây là món ăn rất phù hợp để bồi bổ sức khỏe và giúp tăng cường trí lực cho cơ thể.

    Chuẩn bị nguyên liệu:

    – 3gr tổ yến

    – 3gr thịt cua

    – 1gr vi cá

    – Xương heo để ninh nước dùng nước ấm, gia vị

  35. qua tang sep says:

    I have decided to re-post this comment here as it is a more appropriate forum. It was originally posted in response to the generally negative discussion surrounding the effort at program prioritization. I made one small factual correction, I have known Bear Baker for 11 years not 6.

  36. Another thing to consider is this, in the past 20 years we have seen numerous “across the board” cuts. This seems ok since it spreads the pain across the entire institution. In reality it harms growing programs that need funding to support the demand for the program. It is far better to make reductions in targeted areas than to cripple all programs. The across the board method of reducing budgets is a sure way to slowly slide into mediocrity.

  37. The problem we faced was that there was no single meaningful scale that could represent the full range of program diversity we were trying to capture, so after considerable discussion over six months, we finally abandoned this model. Add to that the difficulties of developing a meaningful connection model for almost 400 very diverse programs.
    This opportunity comes at a critical point in time since if we accept this task and do it well we will equip the chancellor and the provost with exactly the information (ammunition?) they need to make a compelling argument to the regents and the president to fully fund UAA

  38. How long has it been since any of the programs have been assessed relative to the rest of the other programs to see which ones are maintaining their relevance to the mission of the university and others not so much? Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I do not recall any previous prioritization efforts since I came here in 1994. Unless education is unlike any other endeavor in human activity, the environment changes, technology changes, demand for skill sets change, and as a result some programs may be losing their relevance and yes, the priorities change. This exercise will provide the information necessary to identify those programs that need redirection, additional resources, revision, and some may benefit from being discontinued. The idea that once a program is started it will last forever is not realistic because we live in a dynamic environment and things change.

  39. Because decisions are not based on cost, centrality, or quality, decision
    makers might reconsider readily adopting a strategy of program
    closure in the first place. By closing the programs “they could get away
    with,” decision makers neither meet their goals of saving money, improving
    quality, or streamlining focus, nor do they follow efficient

  40. Several functional subunits (like vocal muscles and brain areals) are needed to produce the echolocating system. Past studies have thought that the loss of one of these subunits was more likely to occur than acquiring all the traits needed to echolocate. But a recent study (Thomassen et al., 2005) suggests that the echolocation subunits were mainly located in the central nervous system, while the subunits in the vocal apparatus were already present and capable of use before echolocation even evolved.

  41. Several functional subunits (like vocal muscles and brain areals) are needed to produce the echolocating system. Past studies have thought that the loss of one of these subunits was more likely to occur than acquiring all the traits needed to echolocate. But a recent study (Thomassen et al., 2005) suggests that the echolocation subunits were mainly located in the central nervous system, while the subunits in the vocal apparatus were already present and capable of use before echolocation even evolved. This study supports the second hypothesis of independent evolution of echolocation in Aerodramus and Collocalia, with the subsequent evolution of complex behavior needed to complement the physical echolocation system, or even the third approach, as the vocal apparatus-parts of the echolocation system might even be inherited from some prehistoric nocturnal ancestor.

  42. The problem we faced was that there was no single meaningful scale that could represent the full range of program diversity we were trying to capture, so after considerable discussion over six months, we finally abandoned this model. Add to that the difficulties of developing a meaningful connection model for almost 400 very diverse programs.
    This opportunity comes at a critical point in time since if we accept this task and do it well we will equip the chancellor and the provost with exactly the information (ammunition?) they need to make a compelling argument to the regents and the president to fully fund UAA

  43. Hiya, I am really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is actually irritating. A good site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  44. “The AcTF has explored the strengths and weaknesses of the original model that was suggested to us (the so-called Dickeson Model), and using it as a starting point, has explored a range of options for both the creation of groups of programs, as well as the means of getting programs into these groups. The emphasis has been on flexibility and meaningfulness, as well as comprehensibility across the wide university community. We have defined the grouping and connection models that we intend to use for this process, while reserving the right to alter these if the data suggest that a better solution.” thank youfor sharing,i ilke your post

  45. Thank you for sharing. It so great

  46. However although education is considered compulsory for every child, other parents will prefer homeschooling for their children either in formal or informal settings.

  47. The document of phd cover letter are now very necessary in our university because its remove all the issues through our studies.

  48. However although education is considered compulsory for every child, other parents will prefer homeschooling for their children either in formal or informal settings.

  49. asharel.com says:

    FGPJ seems to be one of the best solution

  50. Write AN essay may be a terribly easy operating. We tend to afford you a mix of varieties of essay and the way to jot down AN essay so-so service.

  51. I have decided to re-post this comment here as it is a more appropriate forum. It was originally posted in response to the generally negative discussion surrounding the effort at program prioritization. I made one small factual correction, I have known Bear Baker for 11 years not 6.

    Hi All,
    I have resisted commenting until now, but it is time for a counter-point to the discussion that has been going on. I do not agree with the criticism of the program prioritization effort or the action that is being taken to delay or prevent it. My thoughts are as follows:

    The prevailing tone of the conversation to this point is one of fear and defensiveness. That seems odd since this is an opportunity for all of us to toot our own horn and inform the administration regarding the value added by our respective programs. This opportunity comes at a critical point in time since if we accept this task and do it well we will equip the chancellor and the provost with exactly the information (ammunition?) they need to make a compelling argument to the regents and the president to fully fund UAA.

    I understand that there are faculty who are critical of the instrument proposed to use as a template for program prioritization. What seems to be missing from the debate is the realization that the institutions that made all the cuts after using this tool were in deep financial trouble before the prioritization was even started. Blaming the template for the cuts that were made in other institutions is like blaming a saw for cutting wood the wrong length. We are not in the same position. I believe that the provost and chancellor are attempting to be proactive and prevent the very thing so many seem afraid of, the dreaded program cut.

    How long has it been since any of the programs have been assessed relative to the rest of the other programs to see which ones are maintaining their relevance to the mission of the university and others not so much? Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I do not recall any previous prioritization efforts since I came here in 1994. Unless education is unlike any other endeavor in human activity, the environment changes, technology changes, demand for skill sets change, and as a result some programs may be losing their relevance and yes, the priorities change. This exercise will provide the information necessary to identify those programs that need redirection, additional resources, revision, and some may benefit from being discontinued. The idea that once a program is started it will last forever is not realistic because we live in a dynamic environment and things change.

    Another thing to consider is this, in the past 20 years we have seen numerous “across the board” cuts. This seems ok since it spreads the pain across the entire institution. In reality it harms growing programs that need funding to support the demand for the program. It is far better to make reductions in targeted areas than to cripple all programs. The across the board method of reducing budgets is a sure way to slowly slide into mediocrity.

    Finally, a word about the chancellor and the provost. I know both of these men pretty well professionally. I served as associate dean for academics and department chair under Chancellor Case for four years when he was dean of CBPP. His mantra is “service before self” and he exemplifies this. I have known Bear Baker for over 11 years, four of them as dean of CBPP. He is also driven by the desire to make a positive contribution and to serve. Neither of these men is serving in the capacity that they do as a stepping stone to the next higher academic position like so many of our leaders in the past. Both of them are men of unimpeachable integrity with the best interests of this institution at heart.

    Stonewalling or delaying the program prioritization effort because of ungrounded suspicions will deny the chancellor and provost the information that they need to make a rational data driven appeal for the support that UAA needs and deserves. If that is what you want to do that is your choice. As for me, I am rolling up my sleeves and doing whatever I can to get the template completed accurately and fully as quickly as I can. The legislature is not interested in increasing the university budget as indicated by the letter that was circulated last week signed by six key legislators. If we don’t equip our chancellor and provost with the data to present compelling arguments in support of funding our institution we will deserve what we get (or don’t get).

    Sincerest Regards,

    Frank Jeffries, Ph.D.
    Professor
    UAA College of Business and Public Policy
    (907) 786-4162

  52. N.Bhattacharyya says:

    It is the same old wine in a new bottle. It is the same five quintiles of Dickeson now being called FCPJ. That P should stand for Political and not Professional.How can you rank order different branches of knowledge? Indeed the only academic study I know of Prioritization finds that the programs that are hit are those where the decision makers think they can get away with it.
    See
    Decision Rules Used in Academic Program Closure: Where the Rubber Meets the Road
    Peter D. Eckel
    The Journal of Higher Education , Vol. 73, No. 2 (Mar. – Apr., 2002), pp. 237-262
    Published by: Ohio State University Press
    Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558411
    Abstract(:
    By what criteria do institutions decide which academic programs to terminate? This study adopts a decision/action rationality framework to explore the criteria used to close programs at four universities. Findings suggest that decisions are based upon criteria other than cost, quality, and centrality and that process leads to criteria generation.

    I quote from this paper:
    “This study suggests that the majority of decision criteria identified are
    not used to select programs for closure. Rather, institutional decision
    makers use alternative criteria, ones that lead to action. Simply having
    stated criteria, and possibly a process to develop those criteria, may be
    more important to the discontinuance process than serving a utilitarian
    choice purpose. Stated criteria most likely fulfill a symbolic role needed
    to generate commitment and action.

    Because decisions are not based on cost, centrality, or quality, decision
    makers might reconsider readily adopting a strategy of program
    closure in the first place. By closing the programs “they could get away
    with,” decision makers neither meet their goals of saving money, improving
    quality, or streamlining focus, nor do they follow efficient
    processes. Closure processes might cause pain, disruption, and hard
    feelings for possibly little actual return. Decision makers thus are caught
    between reaching their intended goals-which in the case of program
    discontinuance tend to be reducing costs, enhancing quality, or realigning
    institutional strategy-and closing politically vulnerable programs
    that may do little to increase quality, save money, or create new strategy.” (pages 257-258)

  53. Tracey Burke says:

    I am also on the AcTF. I support everything Bill has said as accurate; however, I would highlight other aspects of our discussions. Perhaps Bill’s and my approaches to Reconsidering the Quintiles reflect our professional and disciplinary backgrounds. (Note to those worried about AcTF not having sufficient representation: While we are not “representing” any programs, insofar as we are not advocating for or against any, we do bring different ways of thinking that I believe include the many approaches of UAA faculty.)
    I originally favored the quintiles – 5 equally-populated categories – as a fair compromise between simple and meaningful. Our task was to evaluate programs comparatively; not simply to rate the intrinsic value or quality or any program in isolation, but to identify which were most important, most central, to who we (UAA) think we are and who we want to become. The Further Review quintile was never meant as a statement that “20% of our programs are lousy” but that “these 20% are relatively less important, and freeing up some of these resources may allow us to grow these other, more central programs.” The Further Review quintile has caused a lot of angst, not only because freeing up resources probably means reducing or eliminating some programs, but because the forced 20% seemed harsh and artificial.
    However, it’s really the Transformation category that made the forced 20% artificial. This is the category that keeps the categories from being linear; this is the wildcard. This is the one I think of as “these are programs that we must have – and that we must dramatically re-imagine.” One can’t have a university without basket weaving, right? Yet, if we on the AcTF discern that UAA has a weak basket-weaving program, we would place it here so it can get the attention (devoted thinking, restructuring, resources?) it needs. I quite like this category. Yet to say a priori that 20% of programs belong here? Hmm. Nonetheless, the quintile system was good enough in other ways that I was okay with 20% in Transformation.
    Now we’ve moved away from forced equal distribution, though after much discussion we chose to retain forced minimal distribution (15% of programs per category). The prioritization endeavor is still fundamentally about identifying what is most central so that if and when it is necessary, the provost and PBAC can free up resources – and we need something in Further Review for that. To use entirely free distribution would reduce the comparative function of the endeavor; Further Review would wind up as simply a very few “lousy programs.” Much more stigma for those programs; much less flexibility for those that need to make the resource numbers come out right. With forced minimal distribution, every category (no longer quintiles) still will be populated, but the AcTF has more discretion for placement of 25% of programs.
    Given the continuing need to evaluate the relative importance of our many programs, I think this is fair.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

AcTF Open Dialogue

This is a community forum for people to share their perceptions and experiences with UAA’s process of prioritizing of academic programs. Members of the AcTF will post to share their experiences of task force deliberations and dialogues with the UAA community. We encourage well-informed and open dialogue about this process. Anyone is welcome to comment on posts. Find more information on UAA's Prioritization Process Website.
Skip to toolbar